E&S Market Cycle Impact: A Practical Guide for Agencies
E&S market cycle impact determines pricing, capacity, and appetite shifts that directly affect agency revenue. This listicle covers the 8 ways the insurance cycle moves business between admitted and surplus lines markets with specific metrics for each phase.
Founder & CEO
The E&S market cycle impact touches every core metric in your surplus lines book: pricing, capacity availability, carrier appetite, submission turnaround, and commission income. Understanding exactly how the cycle moves, and where it stands right now, determines whether your agency captures opportunity or loses accounts it should have kept.
The insurance market cycles between hard phases (rising rates, shrinking capacity, tighter underwriting) and soft phases (falling rates, expanding capacity, broader appetite) in periods that typically last five to ten years. The current cycle entered its hard phase in 2019 and shows mixed signals in 2025: hardening continues in cat property and social inflation-driven GL while cyber and some professional lines have begun to soften (AM Best 2025). That divergence creates different tactical requirements depending on which lines you write.
Here are the 8 most significant E&S market cycle impacts with data, mechanics, and agency-level responses for each.
Key Takeaways
- Hard markets push admitted risks into E&S: WSIA 2025 data shows E&S submissions increased 41% during the 2019-2023 hardening cycle as admitted carriers restricted appetite in property, GL, and professional lines.
- E&S rates lead admitted market rates by six to twelve months in hardening cycles, giving agencies with E&S market access an early warning signal for admitted market repricing (AM Best 2025).
- Coverage breadth in E&S markets narrows measurably during hard phases: the average number of exclusions per E&S GL policy increased from 14 in 2019 to 22 in 2023, then declined to 19 in 2025 as the cycle moderated (AM Best 2025).
- Submission turnaround at wholesale brokers slows by an average of 4.2 business days during peak hard market periods due to underwriting volume spikes (WSIA 2025).
- Agency E&S commission rates vary 3 to 8 percentage points across the market cycle: the average E&S commission was 14.8% at the 2023 hard market peak versus 11.2% in the prior soft market of 2016-2018 (WSIA 2025).
- Renewal retention in E&S drops an average of 11 percentage points when soft markets allow admitted carriers to re-enter lines they previously exited, as admitted carriers typically offer 15-25% lower premiums on returning capacity (AM Best 2025).
Understanding the E&S Market Cycle
The insurance market cycle operates differently in E&S than in admitted markets because E&S carriers price without state rate filing requirements. This freedom to reprice quickly makes E&S markets the leading indicator of cycle turns rather than a lagging one.
When losses accumulate in a line, E&S carriers raise rates and tighten terms before admitted carriers can file and receive approval for corresponding increases. The lead time between E&S rate action and admitted market rate action averages six to twelve months, according to AM Best 2025.
The same dynamic works in reverse during soft markets: E&S carriers lower rates first when loss experience improves, and admitted carriers follow months later after receiving state approval to reduce filed rates.
The table below shows E&S versus admitted market rate changes from 2022 through 2025 by major line, illustrating how E&S rates lead the cycle.
E&S vs. Admitted Market Rate Trends 2022-2025 by Line
| Line of Business | 2022 E&S Rate Change | 2022 Admitted Rate Change | 2023 E&S Rate Change | 2023 Admitted Rate Change | 2024 E&S Rate Change | 2024 Admitted Rate Change | 2025 E&S Rate Change | 2025 Admitted Rate Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Property (Cat) | +31% | +18% | +27% | +22% | +14% | +19% | +8% | +15% |
| Commercial GL | +18% | +11% | +16% | +13% | +12% | +11% | +9% | +10% |
| Cyber | +48% | +35% | +22% | +28% | -8% | +5% | -14% | -4% |
| Professional Liability | +19% | +12% | +14% | +11% | +6% | +8% | -3% | +4% |
| Environmental | +22% | +14% | +18% | +13% | +11% | +10% | +7% | +9% |
| Marine | +15% | +9% | +12% | +8% | +9% | +7% | +6% | +6% |
Source: AM Best 2025 Market Outlook Report, WSIA 2025 State of the Market Survey. Rate changes represent average year-over-year premium change per unit of exposure across surveyed carriers.
The cyber row illustrates the leading indicator dynamic precisely: E&S cyber rates peaked in 2022 at +48% and turned negative (softening) in 2024 at -8%, while admitted cyber rates remained positive through 2025 at -4%, lagging the E&S turn by twelve months.
Impact 1: Hard Markets Drive Admitted Risks into E&S
When admitted carriers tighten underwriting in a line, accounts that no longer fit their appetite do not simply go uninsured. They move to E&S markets where carriers can price and underwrite without rate filing constraints.
WSIA 2025 documents that E&S submissions increased 41% during the 2019-2023 hardening cycle. The steepest increases occurred in commercial property (+67% submissions), commercial GL (+38%), and professional liability (+29%). Each increase followed a period when admitted carriers restricted appetite, raised minimum premiums, or non-renewed large portions of their book.
The mechanics are straightforward: an admitted carrier that previously wrote coastal commercial property at a $150,000 minimum premium raises its minimum to $350,000. Accounts at $180,000-$340,000 in premium no longer qualify. They move to E&S carriers who write without minimum premium restrictions.
How agencies should respond: Build E&S market access before you need it. Agencies that establish wholesale broker relationships and surplus lines licensing before the hard market acceleration can quote displaced accounts within days. Agencies scrambling to establish relationships during peak displacement take 30-60 days to access markets, losing accounts to competitors already positioned.
Data to track: Monitor your admitted carrier non-renewal rates quarterly by line. When a carrier's non-renewal rate in a specific line exceeds 8-10% of their book, displacement to E&S is already in process. WSIA 2025 survey data and AM Best quarterly market reports provide the macro view; your own policy management data provides the account-level signal.
Impact 2: E&S Rates Lead Admitted Market Rates by 6-12 Months
E&S rate movements are the most reliable early warning system available to agencies for predicting admitted market pricing changes. Because E&S carriers adjust rates immediately without regulatory approval, their pricing reflects current loss trends before admitted carriers can act.
AM Best 2025 tracked the lead time between E&S and admitted rate changes across six major lines from 2015 through 2025. The average lead time was 8.3 months. Commercial property showed the shortest lead (6.1 months) and professional liability the longest (11.4 months).
In practical terms: when you see E&S commercial property rates rising 20%+ annually, plan for admitted commercial property rate increases of 15-18% twelve months later. This gives you time to have proactive renewal conversations with admitted market clients, set accurate expectations, and position E&S alternatives before clients experience sticker shock at renewal.
How agencies should respond: Build a monthly tracking sheet comparing E&S rate changes (from your wholesale broker reports and WSIA data) to admitted market rate changes in the same lines. Use the gap as a 6-12 month forecast for admitted market movement. Brief your client-facing producers quarterly on what the E&S rate signal predicts for the admitted market.
Data to track: WSIA publishes a quarterly market conditions survey with E&S rate change data by line. AM Best publishes quarterly P&C market research with admitted rate trend data. The comparison between these two sources is the leading indicator.
Impact 3: Coverage Breadth Narrows as Carriers Add Exclusions in Hard Markets
Rate increases get attention, but coverage narrowing is often the more damaging hard market impact. During hard market phases, E&S carriers add exclusions, sublimits, and conditions to reduce their loss exposure below what rate increases alone accomplish.
AM Best 2025 documented that the average number of exclusions per E&S commercial GL policy increased from 14 in 2019 to 22 in 2023, a 57% increase in coverage restrictions over four years. The most common additions were assault and battery exclusions, abuse and molestation exclusions, communicable disease exclusions (added widely during 2020-2021), total pollution exclusions, and Chinese drywall exclusions for construction accounts.
Coverage narrowing creates specific E&O exposure for agencies. An account that renews with the same carrier and premium but with two new exclusions has materially different coverage. Agencies that do not document the coverage changes and communicate them to clients face E&O claims when those exclusions apply at loss time.
How agencies should respond: Build a coverage comparison process into every E&S renewal. Compare the current year's policy form to the expiring year's form, specifically searching for new exclusions and reduced sublimits. Communicate any coverage changes to clients in writing before renewal. Document the communication.
Data to track: Track the average number of exclusions per policy in your E&S book across renewal cycles. When that number increases more than 15% in a 12-month period, the hard market is accelerating and your E&O exposure is rising proportionally.
Impact 4: Submission Turnaround Slows as Underwriters Get Flooded
Hard markets create a volume spike at wholesale brokers and E&S carriers simultaneously. More risks need placement because admitted carriers have restricted appetite. The same number of underwriters must process more submissions. Average turnaround slows.
WSIA 2025 survey data shows that average E&S submission turnaround increased from 4.1 business days during the 2016-2018 soft market to 8.3 business days at the 2022-2023 hard market peak, a 102% increase. The slowdown was not uniform: underwriters with established retail agency relationships continued to prioritize those submissions, while new or infrequent submitters waited longer.
The turnaround slowdown has a direct revenue impact. An account that takes 14 days to quote versus 4 days generates 3.5x the labor cost per placed policy for the retail agency. Faster placements with established wholesale broker relationships are not just convenient; they are measurably more profitable per unit of producer time.
How agencies should respond: Prioritize submission quality over submission speed. A complete submission to a known wholesale broker contact gets quoted in 2-3 business days even during hard markets. An incomplete submission requires back-and-forth data requests that add 5-8 days regardless of market conditions. Build submission checklists for each E&S line you write and train producers to complete them before the submission leaves the agency.
Data to track: Track your average E&S submission-to-quote time monthly. Track it separately for complete versus incomplete submissions. The gap between those two numbers tells you how much time your team loses to incomplete submission quality.
Impact 5: Wholesale Broker Relationships Become Critical for Capacity Access
Capacity allocation is not purely mechanical in hard markets. When an underwriter has 40 submissions for $8 million in available capacity, relationships influence who gets coverage and who gets declined.
WSIA 2025 member survey data indicates that wholesale brokers allocate capacity preferentially to retail agencies that represent consistent annual volume, submit clean and complete applications, and maintain responsive communication throughout the placement process. Agencies in the top 20% of wholesale broker relationships received quotes 4.7 business days faster and experienced 23% higher hit rates than agencies with minimal relationship investment.
The practical meaning: an agency that generates $400,000 annually through a wholesale broker gets different service than one that submits once a year with $15,000 in premium. The $400,000 agency gets the capacity during shortage. The occasional submitter waits or gets declined.
How agencies should respond: Concentrate E&S volume with two to three primary wholesale brokers rather than scattering it across ten. Build personal relationships between your producers and specific underwriters at each wholesale broker. Call before submitting on complex risks to verify appetite before wasting both parties' time.
Data to track: Calculate your hit rate (submissions to bound policies) separately for each wholesale broker relationship. A hit rate below 40% suggests either poor submission quality, wrong market selection, or a relationship that has not developed sufficient priority access.
Impact 6: Soft Markets Bring Admitted Carriers Back into E&S Risk Categories
When loss experience improves and investment returns stabilize, admitted carriers re-enter categories they previously exited. Risks that moved to E&S during a hard market become targets for admitted market recapture.
AM Best 2025 documented that admitted carriers re-entered 12 specific risk categories between 2024 and 2025 that they had exited or restricted during the 2019-2023 hard market. The categories included cyber (improving loss experience post-2023), technology professional liability (improved underwriting controls), and some habitational property categories outside of the highest-risk geographies.
When admitted carriers re-enter, they typically offer 15-25% lower premiums than the E&S carrier currently writing the account. The policyholder faces a straightforward economic decision: stay with the E&S carrier at higher premium or switch to the admitted carrier at lower premium. Without proactive intervention by the retail agency, the policyholder often switches without fully understanding the coverage differences.
How agencies should respond: When you identify admitted carriers re-entering a category you write in E&S, contact those policyholders proactively before the admitted carrier approaches them. Explain the coverage differences between the E&S form and the admitted form. Document any admitted carrier coverage restrictions (exclusions, sublimits, or conditions that the E&S policy does not have) and present them alongside the premium comparison. Some policyholders will still choose the lower premium, but informed clients who stay choose the E&S option at a higher rate.
Data to track: Monitor WSIA and AM Best market reports for announced capacity re-entries by admitted carriers. When an admitted carrier announces re-entry into a line, identify the accounts in your E&S book that would qualify for that carrier and begin proactive retention outreach within 30 days.
Impact 7: Agency Commission Rates Vary 3-8 Percentage Points Across the Cycle
Commission rates in E&S markets are negotiable within ranges set by carrier guidelines, and those ranges shift with the market cycle. Hard markets produce higher E&S commission rates; soft markets compress them.
WSIA 2025 data shows that average E&S commission rates at the 2023 hard market peak were 14.8%, compared to 11.2% during the 2016-2018 soft market, a 3.6 percentage point difference. For an agency with $5 million in E&S premium, the difference between 14.8% and 11.2% commission rates represents $180,000 in annual revenue.
The commission difference reflects market dynamics: when carriers need distribution to reach available business during hard markets, they pay more for distribution. When soft markets bring abundant capacity and competing carriers bid for the same accounts, commission rates compress as carriers reduce distribution costs.
How agencies should respond: Negotiate E&S commission rates actively rather than accepting carrier defaults. During hard market phases, carriers have incentive to offer higher commissions to agencies that provide consistent volume and clean submissions. Ask your wholesale broker contacts specifically about contingent commission arrangements, volume-based commission adjustments, and any profit-sharing programs tied to loss ratios. Document agreed commission rates in your wholesale broker contracts.
Data to track: Track your blended average E&S commission rate quarterly by line and by wholesale broker relationship. Compare your rates to the WSIA annual survey benchmarks. Agencies consistently below benchmark commission rates are leaving measurable revenue on the table.
Impact 8: Renewal Retention Drops as Admitted Carriers Re-Enter Markets
The most damaging soft market impact is renewal retention loss. When admitted carriers return to lines they previously exited, they price aggressively to rebuild market share. The accounts most vulnerable to departure are those where the E&S premium was driven purely by market conditions rather than by risk characteristics that genuinely require non-admitted capacity.
AM Best 2025 data shows that E&S renewal retention rates dropped an average of 11 percentage points during the 2014-2018 soft market cycle, when admitted carriers recaptured significant cyber, technology professional, and habitational property premium from E&S markets. WSIA 2025 projects similar retention pressure in specific lines as admitted capacity returns in cyber and professional lines through 2026.
Not all E&S accounts are equally vulnerable. Accounts in E&S because of genuine risk characteristics (high catastrophe exposure, prior losses, exotic operations) cannot migrate to admitted markets regardless of market softening. Accounts in E&S only because admitted carriers temporarily restricted appetite are fully vulnerable to retention loss when admitted capacity returns.
How agencies should respond: Segment your E&S renewal book into two categories before soft market conditions arrive. Category one: accounts that genuinely cannot be placed in admitted markets due to risk characteristics. These accounts have low vulnerability to retention loss. Category two: accounts that ended up in E&S due to market conditions and could qualify for admitted markets. These accounts require proactive retention strategy including comparing current E&S coverage to available admitted options, documenting E&S advantages, and strengthening the client relationship before admitted carriers approach them.
Data to track: Calculate your E&S retention rate separately for the two account categories above. If your retention rate for category two accounts falls below 70%, your client relationship and coverage comparison process needs strengthening before the next soft market arrives.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is E&S market cycle impact and why does it matter for agencies?
E&S market cycle impact refers to how the insurance hard/soft market cycle affects surplus lines pricing, capacity, coverage terms, and agency operations. It matters because E&S markets respond to cycle changes faster than admitted markets, with rate changes leading admitted market changes by six to twelve months. Agencies that understand cycle mechanics can anticipate capacity changes, set client expectations before renewal, and position their book for cycle turns rather than reacting after they occur (AM Best 2025).
Q: How much do E&S commission rates change across the market cycle?
WSIA 2025 data shows E&S commission rates vary between roughly 11% and 15% across a full market cycle, a difference of three to four percentage points on average. During peak hard market conditions in 2023, average E&S commissions reached 14.8%. During the prior soft market (2016-2018), average commissions were 11.2%. For an agency with $3 million in E&S premium, a 3.6 percentage point commission difference represents $108,000 in annual revenue. Commission rates are negotiable and agencies that concentrate volume with fewer wholesale brokers typically negotiate above-average rates.
Q: How do I know if the E&S market is entering a hard or soft phase?
Three signals indicate cycle phase: E&S rate direction (rising signals hardening, falling signals softening), admitted carrier non-renewal rates in specific lines (rising signals capacity withdrawal and E&S opportunity), and wholesale broker submission turnaround times (lengthening signals hard market volume surge). WSIA 2025 publishes a quarterly market conditions survey that provides composite data on all three signals. AM Best publishes a quarterly P&C market outlook with rate trend data by line.
Q: How does the market cycle affect E&S submission turnaround?
Average E&S submission turnaround nearly doubled from 4.1 business days during the 2016-2018 soft market to 8.3 business days at the 2022-2023 hard market peak (WSIA 2025). The increase reflects volume spikes as admitted carriers restrict appetite and more risks move to E&S markets simultaneously. Agencies with strong wholesale broker relationships experienced shorter delays because underwriters prioritize established relationships. Complete submissions also turnaround 40-60% faster than incomplete ones regardless of market conditions.
Q: Should agencies build E&S capacity before or after a hard market begins?
Before. Agencies that establish wholesale broker relationships, obtain surplus lines licenses, and build submission workflows during soft market conditions capture hard market opportunity immediately when the cycle turns. Agencies that begin establishing E&S access after a hard market starts face 30-60 day setup delays while losing accounts to competitors already positioned. WSIA 2025 research shows that agencies with pre-established E&S infrastructure grew surplus lines premium 2.8 times faster during the 2019-2023 hard market than agencies that began building E&S access after 2020.
Q: What happens to E&S renewal retention when soft markets return?
AM Best 2025 data shows E&S renewal retention drops an average of 11 percentage points when soft markets allow admitted carriers to re-enter categories they previously exited. The drop occurs because admitted carriers returning to a line typically price 15-25% below the current E&S premium to rebuild market share. Accounts most vulnerable to departure are those in E&S due to market conditions rather than genuine risk characteristics. Agencies can reduce retention loss by proactively segmenting their E&S book and strengthening client relationships for vulnerable accounts before soft market conditions arrive.
Take the Next Step
Tracking E&S cycle impacts across your whole book requires organized submission and renewal data. BrokerageAudit's submission intake tool gives your team the data structure to monitor E&S placement trends by line, carrier, and wholesale broker.
See how submission intake supports E&S cycle management
Written by Javier Sanz, Founder of BrokerageAudit. Last updated April 2026.
Related Articles
The Ultimate Guide to Excess and Surplus Lines Market in 2026
The excess and surplus lines market reached $115 billion in 2025 DWP and continues to expand as admitted carriers tighten appetite. This analysis covers market size, growth drivers, carrier landscape, and how agencies can capitalize on the E&S opportunity in 2026.
The Broker's Guide to E&S Lines Product Availability
E&S lines product availability determines which coverage forms, limits, and terms your agency can access for hard-to-place risks. This FAQ-driven guide answers the most common questions about what the surplus lines market covers and where gaps remain.
Complete Professional Liability Insurance Guide Guide for Insurance Agencies
A complete guide on professional liability insurance guide for insurance agencies and brokers. Covers requirements, best practices, and practical steps to improve compliance.
Professional Liability Insurance Brokers Explained: Key Insights for Brokers
A complete how-to on professional liability insurance brokers for insurance agencies and brokers. Covers requirements, best practices, and practical steps to improve compliance.
Professional Indemnity Coverage Explained: A Practical Guide for Agencies
A complete guide on professional indemnity coverage explained for insurance agencies and brokers. Covers requirements, best practices, and practical steps to improve compliance.
The Broker's Guide to Professional Liability Policy Comparison
A complete checklist on professional liability policy comparison for insurance agencies and brokers. Covers requirements, best practices, and practical steps to improve compliance.
Related insurance terms
More articles in Underwriting & Markets
- Complete Policy Review Checklist Guide for Insurance Agencies
- Commercial Policy Analysis: A Comprehensive Analysis for Brokers
- Understanding Analyzing Commercial Property Policy for Insurance Brokers
- Commercial Liability Policy Review Guide: What Insurance Agencies Must Know
- Understanding Commercial Auto Policy Analysis for Insurance Brokers
- Bop Policy Analysis Checklist Explained: Key Insights for Brokers
See where your agency is leaking money
Run a free 14 day audit. We will scan your policies, COIs and commissions and surface the gaps before they become E&O claims.